Author: TWI
As is the annual norm around Eid-ul-Zuha, the supporters of Mr Syed Ali Shah Geelani, leader Tehreek-e-Hurriyat and Chairman Hurriyat Conference (G), were found to be distributing a booklet containing his opinion on ‘India’s oppression of Kashmir’. This 37-page booklet, in Urdu, first surfaced in 2011 titled, ‘Eid-ul-Zua 2011’, and was released by the secessionist leader on 03 Nov 2011, a few days prior to the Muslim festival of Eid-ul-Zuha[1]. A severely abridged version is also routinely provided to tourists at the various hotspots in Kashmir. Ostensibly, the aim of the booklet was to allow a larger audience for his anti-India tirade. It is, and reads like, the text of a speech. With the authorities habitually disallowing him a public namaz on the festival, he stays confined to his Hyderpora house. Faced with the peril of his speechwriter’s effort being laid waste, perhaps a book-release was the sole available choice, which he exercised. The booklet serves as a good sample of Geelani’s thought-process and deserves a closer scrutiny.
As is the annual norm around Eid-ul-Zuha, the supporters of Mr Syed Ali Shah Geelani, leader Tehreek-e-Hurriyat and Chairman Hurriyat Conference (G), were found to be distributing a booklet containing his opinion on ‘India’s oppression of Kashmir’. This 37-page booklet, in Urdu, first surfaced in 2011 titled, ‘Eid-ul-Zua 2011’, and was released by the secessionist leader on 03 Nov 2011, a few days prior to the Muslim festival of Eid-ul-Zuha[1]. A severely abridged version is also routinely provided to tourists at the various hotspots in Kashmir. Ostensibly, the aim of the booklet was to allow a larger audience for his anti-India tirade. It is, and reads like, the text of a speech. With the authorities habitually disallowing him a public namaz on the festival, he stays confined to his Hyderpora house. Faced with the peril of his speechwriter’s effort being laid waste, perhaps a book-release was the sole available choice, which he exercised. The booklet serves as a good sample of Geelani’s thought-process and deserves a closer scrutiny.